DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[Virgil Hilts]

Frogman, I did not cleverly omit the context of your statement and your intended meaning is exactly what I disagree with. It is amazing how you can create such elaborate fiction with regard to what is going on in my head.

Let's look at what you just said:

The only scenario that allows BIDMC to retrieve their license is if the licensee decided it wasn't worth the effort to fight for it.

Humorously you have echoed the exact sentiment with a quote of your own;

Is it possible that Pfizer saw value in the Super EPO and still let it get away?

Of course it's possible. It's what I said.

Whatever "value" Pfizer saw, they nevertheless "let it go anyway" when they could easily have fought for it. Clearly they didn't think it worth the effort of a fight.

So once again you are saying that Pfizer let the Super EPO go without a fight because it was not worth the effort. Do you realize that you are claiming there was no fight? Do you know that you cannot prove a negative? Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because you didn't see a fight doesn't mean there wasn't one.

Your whole arguement hinges on your assumption that if there were a fight, then big, tough Pfizer would have won it. Since there is no evidence of Pfizer winning a fight, you conclude that no fight ever existed. ROFLMAO

Virgil