Thank you, CP and nh, for your thoughtful replies. I've read almost every post on this board over the weekend. Many good reflections: both positive and negative. After all the reading and thinking I cannot escape the uneasy sense that something is more wrong than what we are considering. After 15 years, I fundamentally have no reason to expect that Bavi will represent anything more than a failed forerunner of what eventually will become a revolutionary concept of cancer and perhaps even virus treatment.
I suspect it needs to be in stronger and more competent hands to tweek any possible deficiencies into viability. If it is as revolutionary as the Company has told us, it needs to be demonstrated with unambiguous clarity. For whatever reason it has not been. The Company has failed to protect my investment from either sabotage or control arm surprises (from what I understand THEY set the SUNRISE parameters not the IDMC). Some will think I'm being unfair. I understand. But the unending draining of my investment dollars with little to no upside compensation after 15 years is a failure of management: plain and simple. The "I'm shocked! Shocked!" Casablanca routine of the officers of this Company has become tiresome and irksome.
I suspect also that the increase in short shares displayed after the last reporting was due to Dart being given the heads up. There is an argument that this is a positive because it puts the company shares into strong hands. What annoys me is that Dart (or whomever it is) with a heads-up short and the acquisition of millions of shares at 40cents will permit him to make much more than a ten bagger upon the $5 sale of this company and I won't break even after 15 years.
As I've previously stated, I'm not selling. To do so at this point is just plain silly. But the frequently trumpeted ASTRONOMICAL anecdote is dead and if it is ever resuscitated, it'll rival the Easter narrative.
I sincerely hope that those who vociferously disagree with me are right and I am wrong.
