Good morning, Marchio,
Your question reminded me of the TV detective Columbo whose "dumb questions" always went right to the point of the case. If anyone says they "know" what's going to happen with any stock, they're either lying or blessed with inside information that they probably shouldn't have gotten and definitely shouldn't be sharing.
On Friday, the stock at first reacted negatively to the dilution of 900+ thousand shares being issued way down from the prior close, then bounced all the way back (and a little more) when folks realized that less debt is what the company really needs, even if there will be more shares dividing up eventual profits.
What tips the scales, in my opinion for whatever it may be worth, in the bullish direction is that VHUB appears to be a legitimate company in a rapidly growing industry, and in fact appears to be a leader in that industry as regards quality products that have been conceived with an eye on health/safety (see the Diacetyl discussion on this Board a while back).
So, to conclude, if the typical penny-stock company has a (pick a number) 20% chance of turning out to be something better than garbage, I'd think that VHUB has maybe a 40% chance. So why would anyone invest in a company where the chances of success are less than half? ...because the success of the company would likely translate to the stock growing in multiples of the current price. Accordingly, one would fashion a portfolio of these stocks such that the expected failure of a bunch of them would be more than offset to the plus-side by the successes that will happen.
Again, I'm not an investor at all in stocks, given that I am averse to risks in my retirement, so you can choose to accept what I'm writing as being impartial or you can discount my commentary as coming from someone whose money isn't where his mouth is. In either case, I wish you well!
