Thank you, CP, for relaying your perspective after this debacle. I'm one of those investors that does not have time on his side. That being said, I will hold on to my shares, but I have no hope that this investment will provide the cushion needed for my retirement.
Several times before yesterday I nearly posted that, while I have no doubt about the theoretical science behind Bavi, I was not convinced that Bavi would be the drug which brought the theory into reality. The share price was the indicator which never made sense. Even with machinations by hostile forces, Wall Street is rarely outfoxed for years if it is truly convinced of a revolutionary product. And they always have the experts and resources to sniff out such a product early. It was all going on for just too long. What kept hope alive was a combination of various things like Garnick and recently the alliance with MSK. But as I said, the theory behind Bavi may just prove to be greater than the drug itself.
If Bavi is sold to a BP, perhaps if there are deficiencies, the new company has the resources to to tweek it into viability. But the science is advancing and changing rapidly. The patents protecting the upstream technology may be more valuable than Bavi itself.
I remain contemptuous of management and the BOD. Placing Dr. Thorpe's name on the PPHM logo just days before yesterday's PR was another cruel misleading of the investors (like in 2012 when they cancelled a conference appearance and told the investors it was because of family illness). They tell us nothing, except when they have bad news.
I want to thank you for all of your selfless sharing of your research. Please keep posting. Your insights are always worth reading and appreciated.
