DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

Lord of the Dance, I would have you believe no such thing.

You would have us believe that if Pfizer really wanted to tie up the Super EPO they would have tied it up in a legal battle.

It is YOUR claim that Pfizer only obtained the license for Super-EPO to tie it up and keep it off the market. YOURS not mine.

My question is, if in fact Pfizer wanted to tie it up, then WHY DIDN'T THEY?

Furthermore I don't need to provide proof for allegations as I have made none. You on the other hand have demanded proof that a legal battle never existed, because the 'possibility' of a legal battle supports YOUR allegations.

Do your own homework.

As to;

You said that a legal battle would have tied it up for years. My point was that we don't have much information on the timetable here. Isn't it possible that Pfizer did in fact tie it up for years and it was just recently released from the legal process and the appeals last year?

Again, a simple search on your part could determine the timeline that would support YOUR allegations. Help yourself.

It seems quite obvious that you already know the answers and are determined to find some method of avoiding them. lol

And as for your silly attempt to prove a negative, you really need to understand logic. You CANNOT prove a negative. This is not my personal opinion it is a recognized fact.

Feel free to look it up.

regards,
frog