InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 5082
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/26/2012

Re: brandemarcus post# 328625

Saturday, 02/06/2016 3:51:11 PM

Saturday, February 06, 2016 3:51:11 PM

Post# of 797159
It all depends on the court's ruling. The judge can determine that the junior divvies were illegally withheld and decide to reinstate them as a "taking" which, for my FNMAS shares, would be 27 quarters of restored divvies = $7.25/share, just for divvies. If the 8.25% coupon rate is restored by the court, FNMAS will deliver $2.06 per share per annum going forward from there, which would comfortably support a $20 share valuation at 10X, or $35 at patswil's 17X multiple.

You have to be very careful about payment on divvies for non-cume preferred stocks because the rules for their payment or non-payment are governed by the context presented in their prospectus. If a preferred share is sold to the general public as basically an alternative financing conveyance to bonds or secured bank financing... such as to provide liquidity for operations, which is my recollection for FNMAS... the issuer (in this case, Fannie Mae) is obligated to declare a dividend as long as operations generate sufficient profit to pay it, subject to force majeure limitations, such as a government-declared conservatorship.

If the scenario was/is that insolvency would arise by failure to recapitalize, this might be considered a triggering event to justified sustained non-payment of divvies.

JMHO.