Saturday, February 06, 2016 10:12:10 AM
Those words of yours above are good questions. Again, it comes down to context. The offer was made to Bill in September, before any article about FITX specifically appeared. At this point there was no antagonistic relationship between Bill and the G&M - he bragged in a press release about it being done, the G&M knowing it would not be against the rules asked to see it, Bill refused citing security which turned out not to be the case because others had done it.
There is a pattern of behavior.
2013 Bill states we are approved.
2013 HC sends Bill a letter stating they are not approved
Bill states ready to build means we are approved
HC reminds Bill a ready to build means no such thing
and so on until we get to where we are now. Let me guess, a D-minus in research.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM