InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,626.02
(
0.54%
)
US TECH 100
18,986.40
(
0.30%
)
Dow Jones
41,393.78
(
0.72%
)
Brent Oil
71.83
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,089.74
(
0.13%
)
Post# of 30387
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

bocxman

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 2
Posts 1054
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/03/2005

bocxman

Re: None

Friday, 07/14/2006 11:37:07 AM

Friday, July 14, 2006 11:37:07 AM

Post# of 30387
PS: any insider who wouldn't sell shares into a 1000%+ price spike when the spike was based on some outside "pump crew" rather than material developments would be NUTS.

furthermore, if you want to look at a case where the SEC halts due to suspected misleading info, does discovery, and finds wrongdoing -- look at CAFE. after a few weeks of the halt the SEC steps in and starts with the enforcement action.

BOCX, unlike CAFE, underwent SEC scrutiny and the SEC walked away. No amount of academic circle jerk on this message board will change that fact.

DISCLAIMER: NEVER ASSUME INFO ON MESSAGE BOARDS TO BE ACCURATE. ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN DUE DILIGENCE. DON'T BUY STOCK BASED ON THIS POST OR ANY OTHER POST. I OWN A LONG POSITION IN THIS STOCK AND THEREFORE I AM BIASED.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up