Actually, he can't point to anything the CEO said that DIDN'T happen, and thats where he loses ALL credibility. Always forward looking doom and gloom. He is the wrong audience for the company to try to prove anything to. The CEO was VERY CLEAR, 2015 was a building year, and 2016 is the year they focus on revenues. Nothings changed other than no instant gratification, so he reaches back to continue to paint his picture of doom and gloom.
The problem is that he is fixated on discrediting those that try to extrapolate off of company news in a positive direction and he has taken the burden upon himself to act as the policeman of this board. Only trouble is, everything he points to is discredited over time. When you make a false accusation, you get sued, when police do it, they lose their jobs.
