AI
Thursday, July 13, 2006 10:01:55 PM
And now we understand why the "key value" of 0,1% is so significative for mining operations!
Values of 1% and more are not frequent in majority of drill holes (except for Athabaska -style mineralisations)and with it occurs it is taken very seriously by the administration! That's why cies like RSC.v are making all their publicities (in hoping to be buy by Cameco or other majors)with one hole grading 1.5 % on 9,5 m
To johnlw: You're right. And I'm in into JNN
But there are so many data to take into acount in comparing uranium mines vs gold mines; Recovering price, mining processes, exploration and production costs, etc.. vary so much with mineralisation types.
Chamane
ps. Thanks so much to oasdihf, johnlw, earthfarm and others to get us inform on uranium cies. I read you since months and you are so quick to post news!
Values of 1% and more are not frequent in majority of drill holes (except for Athabaska -style mineralisations)and with it occurs it is taken very seriously by the administration! That's why cies like RSC.v are making all their publicities (in hoping to be buy by Cameco or other majors)with one hole grading 1.5 % on 9,5 m
To johnlw: You're right. And I'm in into JNN
But there are so many data to take into acount in comparing uranium mines vs gold mines; Recovering price, mining processes, exploration and production costs, etc.. vary so much with mineralisation types. Chamane
ps. Thanks so much to oasdihf, johnlw, earthfarm and others to get us inform on uranium cies. I read you since months and you are so quick to post news!
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
