InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,522.30
(
1.58%
)
US TECH 100
18,975.16
(
3.68%
)
Dow Jones
40,842.79
(
0.24%
)
Brent Oil
81.51
(
3.75%
)
Bitcoin
64,920.35
(
-1.89%
)
Post# of 104544
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

DDhawk

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 113
Posts 11924
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/09/2009

DDhawk

Re: JimmyBendrix post# 45433

Monday, 02/01/2016 7:50:10 PM

Monday, February 01, 2016 7:50:10 PM

Post# of 104544
That makes one-of-you...I wouldn't ! I'm not alone on that either. And if QMC accomplishes all that's within their sights (or even a large part of it) , they won't need to R/S (excuse the dirty word) to achieve success.
The fact that the latest proxy contains no allowance for dilution or an R/S would support that thinking.
If they were planning on doing it , the proxy would have been the logical time to put it out there.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up