I am keeping everyone on a level playing field, just as you think you do, making sure the information being talked about is accurate, based on the disclosures or what can be reasonably read into from the disclosures. I am sure time will tell on this one, but in the meantime, when posters cherry pick bits and pieces, then attempt to hang their hats on those pits without looking at all the facts in the aggregate, that becomes a problem. I don't think this company fits into your organic, grass roots model, and if you haven't invested yet, then while some of your analysis is legit, the purposes of same are unclear, and sometimes your analysis is lopsided intentionally to push back those who are believers and supporters, and that says its personal. There is no right and wrong here based on emotional sentiment, everyone is entitled to their own emotions, but, as you all know, facts can be presented all sorts of ways, to paint all sorts of pictures. And sometimes, there is motive to focus on a fact that suits your emotional goals. We have all see that on both sides.
