Humanigen Inc (fka HGENQ)

[shajandr]

I wrote:

There is no court order requiring Marty to go to DC. Congress is nott a court. There also is no "production" re: Congress as Congress is nott a party to a lawsuit naming Marty in which evidence production would be relevant.

CONgress could GO to a court and ASK them for a court order. Butt CONgress itself cannot issue a court order.

CONgressional subpoena is NOTT a court ordered subpoena. http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119994740

Every single part of which is entirely correct. What is your problem specifically? Let's walk through each point one at a time:

1. Do you think there is a court order requiring Marty to go to DC? Yes or no, and if yes, which court ordered it.

2. Do you think CONgress is a party to a pending lawsuit against Marty? Yes or no. If yes, in which court is this case pending and what is the case number in which CONgress is a named party.

3. Do you think CONgrees *is* a court? Yes or no. If yes, which specific text of the US Constitution makes CONgress a court and a member of the judicial branch?

4. How can CONgress issue a court order when CONgress is nott itself a court nor a member of the judicial branch? Which judge signs the order for that court?

Since everything in my post is in fact fully correct, and you in your post explicitly claimed that CONgress *is* a court, which it is NOTT, what the hell are you trying to claim in my post is incorrect?

Specifically. Start with answering questions 1 through 4.