InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 4074
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/18/2014

Re: None

Wednesday, 01/27/2016 12:53:03 AM

Wednesday, January 27, 2016 12:53:03 AM

Post# of 63559
I think NV Energy is getting nervous....
Nevada Utility To Propose Compromise in Solar Fee Fight
http://fortune.com/2016/01/25/nv-energy-nevada-solar/
Looks like the voices of the angry Nevada solar customers were heard.

After angry protests, a class action lawsuit, and growing opposition from high profile advocates, Nevada utility NV Energy has extended Nevada’s solar customers an olive branch.

On Monday, NV Energy, which is owned by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Energy, announced that it would submit a proposal to the state regulator that would let customers that already own solar panels avoid new fees over the next 20 years. The new fees, which went into effect this year and are the subject of intense controversy, would still apply to new solar customers.

Utilities across the country have been struggling to figure out how to manage and pay for the influx of home-owners buying solar panels and generating their own power in sunny states like Nevada, Arizona, and California. At the end of 2015, Nevada’s Public Utility Commission approved new rules that added extra fees for solar panel owners and lowered the compensation they received for producing and selling their solar power to the grid.

Nevada’s Governor, Brian Sandoval, NV Energy, and the PUC all took the position that electricity customers who don’t own solar panels were unfairly overpaying for grid maintenance and interconnections while the solar customers were reaping the benefits. Utilities in others states, like Arizona, have taken similar steps.

However, that the ruling also applied to customers that bought solar panels years ago—some having spent tens of thousands of dollars—angered many people. With the added fees, many of the solar customers say they would never have bought panels. Two solar customers filed a class action lawsuit against NV Energy claiming the utility provided false information to the state’s regulator.