![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Wednesday, July 12, 2006 5:13:05 PM
As for;
t must rankle you that while we both agree that the previous licensee (I have to accept Ebo's word of what he heard) could do nothing with it, DNAG can and will do something with it.
What is to rankle?
Whether DNAG can or cannot do anything with EPO remains to be seen, and the prospects look exceedingly dim. The discussion however, is based on the reasons that the previous licensee was unwilling or unable to bring a multi-billion dollar drug to market.
If you would kindly refrain from stepping on the conversation perhaps we can elicit a reasonable response from Virgil, who after all initiated the discussion.
regards,
frog
FEATURED Southern Silver Files NI43-101 Technical Report for its Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Cerro Las Minitas Project • Jul 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM