It will look nothing like that, IMO. The reason is "that" would start a lawsuit nightmare that would devour both ERHC and NGAR.
The CEO and CFO of a company cannot set up a shell of their own and strip assets from the company they are leading. Fiduciary Duty... hello? They would sit in jail for something that stupid.
It's more likely that NGAR is where PN and SO plan to utilize their profit from ERHC's sale. It's legal and makes more sense.
People maintain anonymity for a reason and it is rarely noble.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.