InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 300
Posts 13009
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/30/2013

Re: Fallingknife75 post# 190102

Friday, 01/08/2016 2:54:30 PM

Friday, January 08, 2016 2:54:30 PM

Post# of 238172
That might be a stretch. If it were that simple, the company wouldn't have "rejected" the service's efforts to do the promotion right away. As you can see - it was stated that any questions would be cleared with Vest before hand. If the issue was related to the questions to be asked, the 420Investor service would have been "rejected" upon receipt of the proposed questions...not immediately as it was.

I don't care one way or the other, and I certainly don't mind a bit of healthy speculation...but looking at how incredibly poorly 420Investor "recommended"/promoted stocks have performed since the service's inception, it looks to me that Michele would have had plenty of other reasons for rejecting the service's advances. After all, there is plenty of evidence out there to suggest that market participants continue to actively avoid the stocks closely associated with 420Investor.
That being so, and regardless of her reasoning, it appears Sides made the right call.