He claims neutral but its FAR from that. And if the company put out that information in a PR, I am sure it can be verified by its SEC counsel who probably had to approve the release before it went out. So the continued conspiracy theories that she sold stock, the insiders are selling, there is hanky panky going on is nothing but pure conjecture and BS. Seems like some of you are looking for a reason for this to fail. And then that goes to motive whether you play high and mighty, neutral or otherwise.
Seems that the more transparent she is, the more she is attacked for it. Go play with the soft drink companies, they are more interesting at the corporate level.
