InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 297
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/03/2014

Re: wynns01 post# 44418

Wednesday, 01/06/2016 11:18:06 AM

Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:18:06 AM

Post# of 104482
All interesting thoughts. One thing to bare in mind is that whatever investor sentiment is and whichever company seems to come out on top, eventually all companies will try to build the most robust I.P. portfolio. For that reason alone i will hold onto my chunk of qtmm.

It may be that Squires never intended QMC to be a producer of dots but rather a Company that the top dog can't afford not to buy. Personally i'd rather see qtmm dividends flowing in long after i've retired, but if they are bought out by a QD Vision or Nanosys made public, i'd hold that ticker too as this industry is warming up fast.

While i think the tetrapod dots will be great for many applications, i don't think the display industry wanted anything to do with them as they emit two wavelengths of light (as i understand it). I don't think QMC had anything to offer the display industry that larger and "better established" companies didn't already have before the advent of QDX. That said, i believe we are going to see QLED tech born of QDX which will be the final nail in the OLED coffin.

-Cheers

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.