The question on my mind has become, could the CEO not be aware of the criminal things the auditor was doing or was he playing right into her hand?
All that means is there is a possibility the Auditor legally speaking was used as a scapegoat and is paying the price.
I certainty was led to believe with this second auditor, surely the CEO is innocent and that wasn't the case.
But with the knowledge of a separate privately owned company in the CEO name, the unexplained firing of this second auditor, I can see the potential for some really shady crap an audit may reveal.
We're talking go to jail crap.
I certainly hope this is not the case and some valid unforeseen miraculous reason presents itself.
Problem is, fairy tales are lies.
