Pfffttt reaper,
Of course it is my opinion.
You also posted TRRC production on a few wells and claim to be able to guess the economics of those wells, while also being able make judgments of the entire company’s viability.
I am demonstrably able to make educated guesses about economics on wells. Have you looked at the sorry wells surrounding the Hoppe--I have. The viability of the company is inferred from a lack of good working interest wells, from financial statements and their subsequent retraction. If you want to say everything is great at a corporation that doesn't file annual reports and there is no way to infer anything about risk to the company's viability, go ahead, but I feel I must tell you it makes you look silly.
Its just more nonsense.
I thought you were just trading BECC and felt intuitively that it would run, which it did. I am starting to believe you bought CF's pitch.
Now, I can see that CF is a self-promoter, remember when he dubbed himself the Frackmaster?, but he never talks about his accomplishments. Self-promoters don't keep their accomplishments secret. I can look at their corporate presentation and tell that they have not fracked thousands of wells. That you can't is your deficit, not mine.
You also cant claim that anyone paid 100 times what the stock is worth.
Why can't I. They paid 30 times what it is worth now and it is my opinion that the bottom has not been reached. If you want to say paying fifty cents for a share and selling it for 95 is not overpaying, fine. Most readers will know from context that is not what I was talking about.
or that I claimed Breitling would run because of a luncheon they hosted. You are just making stuff up at this point.
You specifically said you had never seen a company where the CEO had lunch with a congressman fail to run. (I am paraphrasing.Look it up yourself, I am confident you are the only one interested) You posted pictures and were quite excited about it. Now, if you want to pick nits and say you didn't expressly say Breitling would run, fine, but I didn't make it up,it is a real post by you.
Most of the fundamental errors on this board are based on misguided assumptions from the blogs out there, rather than looking at the facts.
I am not responsible for other people's errors.
Breitling didn’t participate in a promotion. Anyone can go out and verify that. Not only did they not do it, its not possible, because the only promotions that happened with the stock happened before Breitling went public two years ago (not five as you claim.)
This doesn't have anything to do with what I said so I feel no need to respond.
You can have doubts about Chris Faulkner being innovative or an industry leader, but you cant hardly state that it is a fundamental error.
Really, I can. After CF being in the industry for 12 years and Breitling being around for six or eight, I would have run across one of their innovations. Additionally, in order to lead the industry then there would have to be some leading going on. Since you are the only person I can find that holding on to those concepts I won't repeat what I have already said. Now, could Beitling have secret innovations? Yes, and I guess that is why some people believe that tripe. But I really don't think a person can have secret leadership.
I think anyone who has been following Faulkner and Breitling could make the case that by being an industry advocate, who has both written and published a book, produced a documentary, as well as being featured on numerous TV and radio shows along with being quoted in dozens, if not hundreds of news articles, that he could be seen as industry leader.
CF is a self-appointed industry advocate. It is one of the amusing things about him. He spends so much time promoting things he is not involved in. I guess some people seeing him as an industry leader is why he has lasted so long. The industry doesn't see him as a leader. As far as CF's speeches and blogs, he is not leading, he is following. He blogs pro-frack stuff he has read and TexasSharon blogs anti-frack stuff she has read, neither is an industry leader. Sure, CF and his former publicity firm were great at getting him on TV. Industry does not turn TV and radio for leadership. If you want to believe that, go ahead. I have read books about the space program, but that doesn't make the author an astronaut. Again, in order to lead the industry, he has to lead the industry, not appear on radio or CNN.
Oh, in his last blog he advocated a North American oil cartel. Let's see if Exxon, CHK, or Continental follow his lead.
Really, if you want to cling to the fantasy that he is an industry leader, by innovation or otherwise, go ahead. You can define words in such a way that he is. Soon you are going to be the only person who cares.
IMO and FWIW.
