InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 516
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/12/2014

Re: None

Wednesday, 12/23/2015 2:05:47 PM

Wednesday, December 23, 2015 2:05:47 PM

Post# of 98531
Batter Blaster failed because of a lack of funding. Nate appears to be on the opposite side of the spectrum here. He's taking on a crap load of debt before he even has a PO. Sean O'Connor said, "Batter Blaster will never IPO". I am very curious why he said that? One has to believe that taking Batter Blaster public was definitely in the discussions between Sean and Nate. Perhaps Sean who worked on the business side of things realized going public meant taking on toxic debt, which would undoubtedly affect share price/market cap. Staying private would of been less risky yet not potentially as rewarding. It's pretty obvious to me that there wasn't a lack of funding but two opposing view points on how it would be done. Sean opted out and Nate agreed to rebrand the name to his own while Sean received a portion of future sales.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NHMD News