Nope FM11, you are still wrong.
It was falsely stated that Breitling has been public for three years. I corrected it by making the simple observation that Breitling has only been public for two.
You then mistakenly tried to claim I was wrong by stating they have been public for five.
Anyone can take a few minutes of their time to see who is posting the correct info.
This has been refuted by me. Asserting something and then repeating it is not support. You prove my point. But you are correct that anyone can find who is correct.
As far as the anti-fracking blogs, I thought we had already established that you have left comments on a few of the them.
Yes and you think commenting on an anti-fracker's blog is the same as being one. I'll let other readers decide if that is correct.
If you are not frackmaster II, who copied and pasted worthless TRRC information on different boards over the last year then I would owe you an apology.
So far only you think well performance, tests, and descriptions are worthless. But, truly, I understand a Breitling fan would need to think so. Nonetheless that doesn't make me an antifrac blogger. Go ahead, say "Are too."
If you make up definitions, for example the definition of stockholder equity, then everything that anyone says could be wrong. I could redefine the meaning of "share" or "corporation" or whatever and show you wrong. Wouldn't communicate much to others and certainly would not persuade.
I want others to do their own research and decide if I am right. If they want to form an opinion without knowledge or thought, that is OK with me.
