InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 45
Posts 2858
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/25/2010

Re: Snowy_Owl post# 134428

Sunday, 12/20/2015 10:10:09 AM

Sunday, December 20, 2015 10:10:09 AM

Post# of 403095
The last part of the last sentence in the update tells a story also.

" we then have an additional two weeks, until March 21st to Respond, if we think it is necessary".

It appears to me from my experience in a class action court hearing,that if this judge is anything like our judge,she just sent a little "birdie with a message" to Rosen by limiting the 60 days to just 3 weeks.

In effect she is hinting that she doesn't like the "smell" of this case.

One would have to be in the courtroom but quite often judges telegraph their attitudes and it seems to be showing here.

"if we think it is necessary"seems to indicate that the judge seems to be favoring Sullivan's position and that Rosen needs to take the hint.

Courts can be fickle but that's the way it looks (to me) at the moment.

Kelt
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IPIX News