![](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uicon/394734.png?cb=1621376897)
Friday, December 18, 2015 2:07:16 PM
Nobody - NOBODY - can answer that question. NTEK had a registration for that mark, butt that is nott definitive proof of owning a valid, enforceable mark. it only provides a presumption which means a defendant has the burden to show the mark is nott legally enforceable or is owned by a different party in fact through use or field overlap.
You've asked a very fact-dependent and situation-dependent question that cannot be answered without a specific case of NTEK attempting to sue a particular third party based on a claim of a trademark for 'the future of television' during that period prior to abandoning the registration of that mark 12 months ago.
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM