InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 625
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/11/2002

Re: None

Friday, 07/11/2003 4:55:30 AM

Friday, July 11, 2003 4:55:30 AM

Post# of 97747
The snowball starts rolling:

http://www.x86-64.org/lists/discuss/msg03806.html

Our work involves chip-design, typically w/ processes that have sizes >2GB
(often in excess of 4GB, but then we have use Sun boxen for it and pay the
price in time and money
). In Linux, one can adjust the kernel/user memory
split up to about 3G/1G comfortably on 32-bit processors (and obviously,
the OS in 32-bit mode). We do this to get a bit more headroom for our
(large) jobs.

What I want to verify, is that on a box running a 64-bit kernel
(i.e. compiled arch == x86_64), a 32-bit user-space app will be able to
use all 4GB (or nearly all of it, perhaps AGP/PCI windows etc cut out a
small amount at the top). Our software vendors (closed-source) have not
released their x86_64 ports yet
, so we will be stuck with 32-bit apps
until probably this fall. _However_ if we can get that extra 1GB of
memory (per process), it will help quite a bit in the short-term (and
probably spare us buying another Sun).


Of course, the answer is that they can use 4Gbytes of memory on a 32 bit app with 64 bit Linux. This will tide them over until the fall, when the ported app is due.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News