Snaper owns (at least he did) 43 million shares. The two "Paybacks" were 60 million. It would take Snaper and all of us to overcome a vote by those two (whoever they are). Snaper was willing to give up some of his ownership in order to move this forward. He recognizes that 20% of something is much more valuable than 75% of nothing. Sound reasoning - He had to trust to somebody and put his trust in this group.
I like the direction they are going and do believe they have a better business and much broader vision than Mr. Snaper. I think that they fully intend to drive this company forward in many ways and am confident they are working diligently toward that goal. I just want to make sure they profit fairly based on company performance and not on special insider deals at the expense of shareholders.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.