KPMG did not sign off on Breitlings financials. Are you inferring that Breitling had no idea they were wrongfully reporting for the three years they have been public the "recording of oil and gas assets, revenue interests and drilling activities?" Matter of fact - KPMG decided to DROP Breitling when they acquired Rothstein.
To be traded on the OTC QB they have to "provide a strong baseline of transparency." Given that they haven't filed anything for 2015 and haven't bothered to amend their previous years. It's highly doubtful. There is nothing transparent about them.
IMO.
I don't see anything in that post talking about Pump and Dump. The above is a response to one of my posts and I know I didn't say anything about pump and dump. You challenged the above statement on the basis of the three years period when BECC expressly said the financials were bad for three. Not that it matters whether it's three or two or five or six, but you had to say he was wrong. I guess that is all you have left.
This would be exactly the kind of thing Chris Faulkner uses. No one will really fault him for saying Breitling went public two years ago, but he knows that in certain people, saying "going public" conjures up images of IPO and corporate savvy that is simply not involved in a reverse merger with a penny shell so that everyone else can move to another penny shell. Those certain people are exactly the investors he is looking for.
CF also knows that he was not materially involved in the fracking of 1000's of wells, but I am sure he has some justification for saying it, like maybe his companies have had a royalty interest in a lot of fracked wells.
Admittedly, there is no way for me to know what goes on in CF's mind so the above speculation is not fact but opinion. I do find it difficult to justify another opinion.
On another subject, do you believe BECC has drilled a producing well every two weeks in the Permian?
