InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 1508
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/02/2011

Re: lbird33 post# 29347

Saturday, 12/05/2015 12:45:21 PM

Saturday, December 05, 2015 12:45:21 PM

Post# of 133006
Here is what you said and I commented back to you that Cisco being worth Billions is definitely smart enough. Cisco doesn't need what VPLM has. No one does. There is zero interest in this outdated technology. Does that clear it up for you?


lbird33 Thursday, 11/12/15 03:37:55 PM
Re: nyt post# 28880
Post #
28881
of 29352 Go
Please enlighten us. Please show us how CISCO was smart enough to patent RBR for VOIP?

You may want to relook at the Alexander patent and than look at VPLM's child patents.

Not sure why you are using LOL's when Cisco wasn't smart enough. It's fact.


My response. What don't you understand? I think Cisco is definitely smart enough.



Dontnosheet Thursday, 11/12/15 05:03:42 PM
Re: lbird33 post# 28881
Post #
28886
of 29353 Go
Cisco worth billions = Not smart enough? Really...?

VPLM made $146 dollars once = Smart enough? Really...?

What am I not understanding...? Have I been wrong my whole life? LOL? Haha?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News