Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[biopharm]

Bungler, the patents came up because someone suggested that, even without any grounds, BP that are ready to do anything according the posters (ref. dose switching incident 2012) would not hesitate to file juts to force PPHM to defend themselves.

I suppose (although the post didn't say it) that this would be aimed at seeding doubt (the large public will not understand the matter/risk as do you) and on the other hand would force PPHM in costly defence.

I think that in that scenario the poster even started from the assumption that whatever BP would do this would do it with the upfront knowledge they had no leg to stand on. Just ways of hindering PPHM to bring Bavituximab to the market or to keep the larger public away from the stock.

CP, wouldn't someone have to sponsor or pay for any such law firm from filing such bogus legal ? I would think it would be easy to see the source from where such filing actually comes from?

Looking beyond all that if that happens, if one such bogus file gets thrown out, could a judge tossing it out actually mean that "NO OTHER" source could also file ?

You would think that any objection to Peregrines PS Targeting patents would have surfaced by now.....