InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 1743
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/16/2015

Re: DCorleone post# 8321

Friday, 12/04/2015 12:46:01 PM

Friday, December 04, 2015 12:46:01 PM

Post# of 32393
Goes to show a little knowledge is dangerous. 1st ELOC cancelled and terminated because the way the look back and conversion feature worked, and the market discount was too dilutive and not good for the company. That was an excellent decision by her. Kodiak? Looks like that was put in place for manufacturing capital since any businessman knows with manufacturing , you are going to pay a 18 - 25% fee on the PO funding anyway - PLUS - you LOSE ALL CONTROL of your A/R's because they have to be assigned to, and collected by the lender. I am guessing you have limited experience with manufacturing lines of credit. Much different than a retail store funding floor plan. Lending source (factor) takes all of his money directly from the receivable, and gives the company its balance. Usually 60 days after receipt. This potential transaction looks to me that the company will control its own revenues and cash flow, and that this is probably just an interim financing solution for inventory - didn't need an MBA to figure that one out. Good thing is, they may never us it. Its there for the company to decide which type of financing would be better for manufacturing. Thats my guess. I know yours. Convert, slam, tank the stock, doom and gloom, bad CEO.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.