![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Tuesday, December 01, 2015 6:34:42 PM
I read thru the article posted by Navy "Why Hindes/Jacobs Plantiffs Will Prevail In The Fane Mae and Freddie Mac Delaware Litigation" posted today.
The author sounds like the Delaware case should be looked at by the Delaware court unlike Lamberth and Pratt's decision to toss out Perry/Continental Western litigations under HERA's blanket cover against any litigation.
Evenif I tried to understand why the author think so, I couldn't grasp exactly how it's different under HERA. Maybe it's because I don't have an enough background to understand legal languages.
Can you please respond in a layman's term what the author is talking about? and Please add your own opinion if you would.
Thanks in advance.
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM