Friday, November 27, 2015 5:32:43 PM
The assets were marked down and marked up by applying equivalent standards imposed by government. There was NO SWEEP when the impaired assets were written down. Only a huge draw from government given to the GSEs. So, when the assets go back up, why would the government be either unfair or criminally-driven to demand their return?
What we have here is a three part harmony being sung by shareholders.
1. We didn't want any bailout and didn't need it.
2. Now that we got it, anyway, we don't want to give it back.
3. When the assets were marked down, it was government's fault.
Now, marking them back up and taking them as profit is also the government's fault.
"We, the shareholders, only want to TAKE. We certainly don't want to pay anything back. See, that way, WE get to keep more money for ourselves."
JMHO.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM