i've worked with statistics myself, i'm sure you have as well. in every dataset if you look hard enough and reduce subsets enough you will always stumble upon one small group that shows some sort of correlation. it's usually chance. normally you decide what you want to prove, research it and check the data if your assumption was correct. looking back at research to see if it proves anything, and only then build your hypothesis, i think it's statistically very dangerous ground. anyway, we'll see over the next months/years i guess.
i also agree on Zack's. You can't take them seriously (nor can you most analysts, but that's a different story). Only reason anyone ever does is they market their "Zacks rank" pretty smart so that every one reads it, and nobody realizes there's no real analyst doing any fundamental analysis there, they're just opportunists trying to get noticed.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM