InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 8449
Next 10
Followers 21
Posts 1750
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/19/2012

Re: None

Monday, 11/23/2015 9:55:19 AM

Monday, November 23, 2015 9:55:19 AM

Post# of 8449
Love this statement by the patent review board in the DSS v AAPL case:

"Because Apple did not present in its Petition competent evidence qualifying Barber as prior art to the ’290 patent, we correctly concluded that Apple did not demonstrate a reasonable likelihood that it would prevail at trial in challenging claims 1–4 of the ’290 patent over Barber"

By the way, this is a hardware patent not a software patent.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent DSS News