My thoughts exactly. What may appear as a scam or fraud actually may be allowable under certain circumstances.
The revision showing actual working many times came after filing that caused buy ins by content of filing, which then turned out to be exaggerated or incorrect.
How long a new company can call ignorance is the question.
Their accountants filed what they were told.
Necessity of so many late and re filings is the reason they can't keep accounts.
They have yet to remedy the library of IPs statement with supporting evidence, with contracts with creators.
Scam, fraud or not, Redg is not going to give us any information through transparency or disclosure.
We shouldn't have to ask states for any company 's info.
So , when and if I get any info, I will gladly share it.
For heavens sake they are not making a nuclear bomb.