InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 160
Posts 11770
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/04/2009

Re: pitts77h post# 816

Friday, 11/20/2015 12:01:30 AM

Friday, November 20, 2015 12:01:30 AM

Post# of 20715
You're wrong. Your timetable is skewed. The revenue from HempAmericana's hemp rolling papers go into next quarter's filing. And the transfer agent confirms there is no dilution, and the float is 7 million.
The names of the stores the rolling papers are currently sold in are available from either the company, or on the website. This is a new company. It's all relevant to when the product was rolled out. If you could prove me wrong, you would have able to VERY EASILY.
I answered these assumptions you raised, all which are easily verifiable. Your statements are proven to be errant at best. If you think you can prove dilution, then call the TA yourself, or some of the stores the product sells in.
This is a new company. The filing of revenue is relevant to when the product was rolled out, not before.
You can call the TA a fraud if you like, but it's pretty meaningless if you can't prove it.
And you can't..because you're WRONG! And I'm right.