Sigma Labs Inc (SASI)

[DriftinWayOfLife]

KMey,

I am a bit late to the discussion of your point of view, however, I would like to bring up a couple of points.

First, with a burn rate of 1M covering +/- 9 months and Sigma holding more than 1M in cash, plus the recent delivery of 3 PR3D systems (Honeywell, Spartacus and a company to be named later) with payment most likely to come either at the very end of this quarter or early in Q1 2016, it would appear to me that Sigma has sufficient cash to continue for a year, as stated by MC during the earnings report.

Second, as to the "increasing expenses" - does this not reflect a ramp up to allow for capacity for delivery of PR3D systems during the year for which cash is already in the bank and which may very well generate more revenues during the 1 year that the current cash will cover?

Third, is it not reasonable to expect some compensation from Additive Industries for the 4 PR3D systems to be embedded in the MetalFab machines that are to be delivered to the beta testing companies - thus generating more cash to continue operations until the "significant revenue" starts to arrive?

Fourth, do you disbelieve MC when he stated that the level of activity in the contract printing area through the Arete-Sigma joint venture are building?

These are just a few off the top of my head, but these questions - and the implied and express position that I take - suggest that Sigma is sufficiently funded for the time being.

I would agree that dilution CAN be a bad thing, but I do not agree with the idea that dilution is ALWAYS a bad thing. Just think back to the private placement a couple years ago of 120,000,000 shares - that kept the doors open. Without that dilution, would Sigma exist today?

patience and GLTA