Followers | 109 |
Posts | 11331 |
Boards Moderated | 4 |
Alias Born | 01/29/2015 |
![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Tuesday, November 17, 2015 3:55:26 PM
I don't want to come out to be a wolf here but I think Danos may have made the same mistake as he did also announce it first. Many old school CEO's don't even know about this rule as it was enacted in 2010. The other company had no idea of it either. The repercussions are the fine and delay in the process.
I sincerely believe The Rule was violated which is the reason why site information was taken down systematically on both sites at precisely the same time.
It worked out with the other one too but just took a little longer getting approval.
It's an educated guess that he made the same mistake, but that would answer some questions.
Here is rule 6490 and the fines associated with the rule violations.
http://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=24087
http://www.finra.org/industry/faq-upc-corporate-actions-faq#2-1
FEATURED Southern Silver Files NI43-101 Technical Report for its Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Cerro Las Minitas Project • Jul 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM