InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 877
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/06/2013

Re: jaymark post# 24320

Monday, 11/16/2015 2:26:25 AM

Monday, November 16, 2015 2:26:25 AM

Post# of 57076
good morning Jaymark....












we are doing fine.

My main proposition is that CEO / PR language is bound to be
vague or abstract and careful : there is no option...but it must also be based on a lot of truthful stuff that remains secret but which can be supported by the actions of others/ clients/ research orgs etc


The there can be no artful or misleading ambiguity within this area: this would be utterly foolish and shown to be as that sooner or later

Our clients cannot be brought into any kind of sleight of hand or crapspeak

If people want an excuse to complain or knock the stock, they will say the language is self-serving and buying time or whatever but there is no equivalence on the positive side..how can there be ?

companies are discussing,installing or testing 110 ton kit that has been treated like it's part of a guessing game ? True or false ?

behind all the secrecy, there is what ? a fat wizard eating a giant
ice cream ? a mad screaming rat called Cecil ?

I don't think so !!