So ISSEN has already -by actions, not words- jumped ship here . To say Redg is a good company but yet move and sell their production company. I still say the answer to all of this lies in non-existing
IPs. People would probably accept delays , setbacks etc if Redg was on solid ground at least in what they owned. It was David in front of TO R US store when all that talk started. He stays on the fringes but uses his influence as successful business partner. After all who would jump onto a sinking ship. David is here with the money.
I have presented what I have determined on my limited knowledge of the working of this situation.
In the beginning ----my main dilemma was to shut up and hope I was wrong. I didn't want to dig this hole any deeper. BUT---by the same train of thought I didn't want other investors lured in by this stock. I felt that if did get successful, people still had time to get in on ground floor.
Redg needs to show us everything. There is zero sec sanctions against companies disclosing business models to public, especially a failed model. How can that sway anyone other than away. We deserve to know.
Taking investors money is one thing, insulting our intelligence is another.
They have done both.
