InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 450
Next 10
Followers 25
Posts 3774
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 01/15/2008

Re: None

Thursday, 11/12/2015 4:39:26 PM

Thursday, November 12, 2015 4:39:26 PM

Post# of 450
"There are, of course, many critics of reusability. And it has less to do with the possibility of successfully landing a rocket and more to do with the condition of a spacecraft after a launch. Doubters argue that even if rockets could be reused, the resulting stress from a trip to space would render the spacecraft subpar for future missions.
Musk acknowledged this challenge during the interview, noting that after SpaceX lands a rocket "intact," the company will then have to examine the rocket for potential improvements.
There will likely be plenty more work for SpaceX after the first successful landing before reusability becomes a reality.
But the upside for SpaceX if it achieves reusability is enormous. Reusability would be revolutionary to the economics of space launch services. As Musk explained during the interview, the cost of its rockets are around $60 million, but the cost of the propellant is only about $250,000 to $300,000 -- "about as expensive as fueling up a 747," Musk noted."Quoted from RickBoozer of SpaceX

My post are my personal views and just that. Not a recomendation to buy or sell a security. Always do your own DD. [

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.