InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 48
Posts 2095
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/08/2011

Re: LouisDesyjr post# 17

Thursday, 11/05/2015 9:28:03 PM

Thursday, November 05, 2015 9:28:03 PM

Post# of 76
It looks almost all of the applications are a lie

I just read one of the other reports about the company. It is clear that without constructing a large antenna, that would be able to cover the BEA for the 20% coverage required for the FCC licenses, that the applications are mostly all a lie.

While the technology can use multiple small antennas, the applications mostly use one point and show it as having a coverage for 30 or 40 miles in order to get the 20% of the BEA required for the license. In order to get that without the horizon stopping the signal, the antenna would have to be 60 or 70 feet off of the ground; but google street view shows nothing that high in the areas.

It is clear that the applications to get the licenses were all a lie. Except for one or two systems at offices they have, I doubt they even have any equipment at any other location that they have a license for.

I am expecting that the FCC will pull all of their licenses once they verify that they were lied to on the applications.

Louis J. Desy Jr.