InvestorsHub Logo

DTL

Followers 101
Posts 7530
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/12/2005

DTL

Re: gwfogre post# 243181

Tuesday, 11/03/2015 3:21:09 PM

Tuesday, November 03, 2015 3:21:09 PM

Post# of 263685
Well said! The other side of the GRCU argument is made with similar logic to the following; "I've never tried Sushi but Sushi is all crap and tastes like crap" and "that Sushi restaurant will be going out of business soon because I don't like sushi". Especially if they hire an attorney named Richard (Dick) Weed; FLMAO! The anti-GRCU argument has historically NEVER been supported with facts and evidence. There is currently zero proof or facts that GRCU is an imminent failure and the quality of their products are poor. There is however a historical attempt to insult or injure GRCU and shareholders on every attempt at success. Then the money argument comes up like longs are in some desperate position to make money or recover losses so they argue on the side of "imminent success and high quality products". LOL!
As though the contrarian knows how much money one has lost or gained betting on GRCU'S success and as though a shareholder's agenda is totally based on nothing but selfish gains. Maybe some shareholders care about investing in a product that helps with numerous ailments, etc.