InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 453
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/28/2015

Re: damizo post# 6968

Tuesday, 10/27/2015 3:40:55 PM

Tuesday, October 27, 2015 3:40:55 PM

Post# of 21105
There are fuel cells with different physical principles. The Hydro Plant does not work on a chemical reaction so that no losses occur through energy efficiency convertions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_cell

The Hydro Plant does not require expensive infrastructure.

The Hydro Plant is compared with conventional fuel cells is relatively small and therefore inexpensive to produce because the Hydro Plant catalytic works: the extra energy coming couple of forces through improved combustion of diesel fuel (diesel which has a perfect infrastructure).

The components of the Hydro Plant are a supplier to the US Army they are suitable for heavy duty conditions.

Last week I saw on television that trucks Mercedez builder had built a hybrid truck diesel for the long haul an electric motor for zero-emission driving in the city center. Maximum range of the electric motor was two kilometers. Not exactly a threat so for the Hydro Plant IMO. AdBlue gets Albeit a lot of particulates from the air but too much AdBlue and the ammonia passes from the exhaust. Moreover, this technology is AdBlue a chain of barriers in the gas flow (hardware) of the combustion gases resulting in an unfavorable fuel economy.

I see no reason not to believe the board of Hydrophi. Tech history as the additional fuel consumption of AdBlue although not literally quoted by Slotkin I see repeatedly confirmed by independent sources (see my earlier publication of "De Financiele Telegraaf"(= dutch financial news paper) and a car magazine.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.