InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 278
Posts 12043
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 02/09/2003

Re: A deleted message

Friday, 10/23/2015 5:54:32 PM

Friday, October 23, 2015 5:54:32 PM

Post# of 148340

I believe this Rice character was a plant by the BIG BUSINESS in itself toxics


igotgame2star: Please explain the scenario you believe occurred or is occurring in which some sort of "big business toxic" "planted" attorney Melissa K. Rice into Drone Service USA (DSUS).

All that is publicly known is that Rice, an SEC-sanctioned attorney still under a 5-year penny stock ban and prohibited from providing attorney letters to OTC Markets, has been added to the DSUS profile page on OTC Markets as both a legal counsel as well as a director/officer:

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/DSUS/profile
http://www.otcmarkets.com/research/service-provider/Melissa-K.-Rice-Esq.?id=724&b=n&filterOn=3

It is unknown who added her to the profile page (a current officer or the "former consultant") or the actual nature of any involvement with the company.

The annual list for the DSUS Nevada corporation due 9/30/15 was filed late on 10/18/15 and did not include Rice as an officer. They did however retain the incorrect Ft. Lauderdale office address from which the corporation, under its former name of PV Enterprises International was evicted for non-payment of rent. It's odd that they did not update the current address on the annual list.

http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=uyx9DfdRU25WJll%252fgaY8sQ%253d%253d

As for your belief that there have been too few negatives posted about her addition, what more can be said, given that there is no information as to her role, if any.

I'm sure I'm not the only one who is dumbfounded that given her documented involvement in and SEC sanctions for penny stock she was added to the DSUS OTC Markets profile page. I'm waiting for more details about her involvement with the company to understand what appears to be a monumentally unwise move. I can't think of anything positive for current common shareholders that she would bring. Unfortunately I can think of a few scenarios that would have a very negative impact on current shareholders.

No one has disputed that appointing Melissa Rice as legal counsel and/or a member of the BOD would be a HUGE red flag. Her background speaks for itself. Indeed, her name being associated with the company is so negative that you assert belief that she is some sort of "plant" by a "toxic." However you have not explained how this evil plot could be carried out or even how a "toxic" would benefit from it. Did this "toxic" have the access codes to update the OTC Markets profile page?

Those who aren't aware of the SEC charges against Melissa K. Rice and her settlement agreement should read the SEC press release and enforcement complaint/litigation against her and several others.

Rice agreed to disgorgement of $422,445, prejudgment interest of $39,239.18, and a penalty of $60,000 as well as a five-year penny stock bar and three-year prohibition from providing professional legal services connected to the offer or sale of securities.



http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1365171488828

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2012/comp-pr2012-82-1.pdf