InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 2087
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/14/2015

Re: None

Wednesday, 10/14/2015 11:23:19 AM

Wednesday, October 14, 2015 11:23:19 AM

Post# of 26028
Zalemark won't release relevant information. Only non-relevant hype.
The JTV lawsuit is relevant.
Having no funding is relevant.
Operating of of a "mailbox" office is relevant.
Getting brand licenses is relevant.
Not getting any sales off those licenses is MORE relevant.
Inaccurate and misleading financial statements is relevant.
Losing money for years is relevant.
Surrendering their ability to do business in or out of California is extremely relevant.
Having a company led by a convicted felon who has been arrested for dealing cocaine and arrested for embezzlement is definitely relavent...no matter how long ago it was.
Wishful thinking boyed by hopes of a great financial return is NOT RELEVANT.
Don't show me packaging as it's not relevant.
Don't show me anything except a sale to a TIER 1 retailer. Opinions are not relevant. Getting sales, revenues and profits are really what's relevant.
Why is that so difficult for Zalemark to do? Could it be that they didn't get their anticipated sales of Crayola Jewellery...that would be extremely relevant.
You can't take "wishful thinking" to the bank but you can get money from investors that think they have done their DD.