Jbem, don’t mean to join in the conversation, but I do have a question that I cannot ask Punit but you. First of all, thank you for the information about the hedge fund managers that own shares of ONCS. A short time ago, Oncosec did not have any of those types of followers. I do believe that there was a slight delay of the trial due to lack of patients, which might be understandable, because it is a very selective trial being run and UCSF is a hospital that has many other options for those types of cancer patients. With time against them, most of the qualified patients were most likely already enrolled in some other trial. In addition, it is a sponsored study being conducted by UCSF, which saves Oncosec money but with consequences, since there is very little urgency towards Oncosec by the doctors and hospital.
So getting to my question, you said it is foolish for Lasers to ask for a link, but it seems more foolish to follow a turd of a company by having lengthy conversations with a large investment firm about Punit and now here at Ihub. It seems you have a different agenda, which is understandable, since you dislike the company and the science behind it. But why always conclude your opinion with a statement about the share price going sub $1 and minutes later to sub $2. That sounds like you have a target price on ONCS, which again it is understandable. But I do not think it is because you want to buy into the company, but rather buy to cover a position. That brings me back to where your conspiracy theory conversation first began, in which you gave out some very good points for your reasoning to probably being short and I thank you for that. However, the lack of sells in shares from last week would make any of the shorts that participated on the last sell off very uncomfortable. Does this conversation have anything to do with covering? Because if it does not, than that would make it seem very foolish.
