InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 1109
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/02/2014

Re: dndodd post# 25859

Tuesday, 10/13/2015 7:22:40 AM

Tuesday, October 13, 2015 7:22:40 AM

Post# of 140477
Agree that the article is lousy. Almost could say computer-generated or written in non-english first. Just a teaser I think for buying company reports.
Titan not mentioned? As I've said 100 times, they are still, unbelievably, off the radar to the investment public. That's the way they want it because they are self-righteous as hell. I hope it doesn't bite them in the end when they turn down some great offers.

As for robotic snake arms: It is critical to make the distinction between Sport's articulated "snake arm" effectors and a true robotic snake arm that has controllers in its articulations. Sport's technology does not really have "robotic snakes". True robotic snakes can form complex curves, and follow paths. Sport's arms are just mechanically driven from an external source. They are "bendy" but not capable of complex curves or path following. Their intrinsic design is not robotic; Sport's console input to effector output is robotic. Their real advantage is size-based only. That is until more micro wristed articulators are developed (picture miniature human hands) or true robotic snakes come into the picture. Sport's overall strength is that it is (hopefully) a quality MIS platform. The snake effectors allow it to have a good geometry for MIS. Whether it's dexterity is all that good remains to be evaluated by the market.

You may think I'm nuts, but Titan needs to sell themselves soon (meaning their pizazz) before they are eclipsed by something more innovative coming down the pike. I trust they are working hard and covering all the bases but it is taking too long and they should have much larger financial resources.