...when questioned about his authoritative post Ontheedge tacitly admits he didn't really know what he was talking about! Who would believe! LOL He falsely thinks I was trying to educate people, when in reality, I was only asking a question:
Posted by: d4diddy
In reply to: ontheedge01 who wrote msg# 8291 Date:2/10/2006 8:22:39 PM
Post #of 12186
Thank you for answering my question:
"Valimed does not differentiate between sterility and non-sterility"
One more point for clarification, you wrote:
"...once bacteria begin to grow in the medication, or when alterations in its compounded structure occur, Valimed does measure the resultant altered composite signature as a change from the original."
This is two separate statements, if I may be allowed to separate them and address the first statement:
"...once bacteria begin to grow in the medication Valimed does measure the resultant altered composite signature as a change from the original."
And? Does it reject the med? For example, if the presence of bacteria adds something to the spectral fingerprint, but the bacteria does not effect the medication or strength and that part of the fingerprint which identifies the medication and strength remains unchanged, how will Valimed interpret this?
Will the test be a pass or fail?
Posted by: ontheedge01
In reply to: d4diddy who wrote msg# 8398 Date: 2/10/2006 10:41:04 PM
Post #
d4diddy:
Sorry, you have gotton beyond that which I can even give an opinion on.
But you know what, you are doing a really good job.
May I suggest you just keep educating us.
And could you post what you wrote September 17, 2004.
tia
